Critical Rant & Rave: Alexandra Bonifield

The Arts, The World: Reflect, Intersect, Inspire

Archive for May, 2009

Grapevine groovy: Under the Yum Yum Tree

Posted by sjamaanka on 29 May 2009

1960 was a banner year for spectacular Broadway shows with stars at the top of their game. Camelot opened, with Richard Burton and Julie Andrews. Bye Bye Birdie brought a first rock n roll score to Broadway musicals. The Sound of Music, featuring Mary Martin, won the Best Musical Tony. The Fantasticks thrilled off Broadway audiences. A genteel, idealized sense of romance dominated the stage. Lawrence Roman’s bedroom farce Under the Yum Yum Tree, which ran for 173 performances on Broadway starting in late 1960, featuring Dean Jones and Gig Young, offered something fresh and different.

 Jill Ethridge, Keith Warren (seated), Shane Strawbridge

Jill Ethridge, Keith Warren (seated), Shane Strawbridge

Roman’s rather explicit and frank treatment of the emerging sexual mores of the era—“shacking up” and openly “free love”—may have offended some, but it ushered in a new paradigm for American comedy. The New York Times review praised the show, saying Mr. Roman had “a gift for keeping the dialogue lively”. This saucy, slightly dated romance still comes off lively and entertaining, viewing its opening night production at Grapevine’s Runway Theatre. The almost full house buzzed with merry anticipation before the lights came up; the audience chuckled, guffawed and sighed in delight as the scenes unfolded. Rabin and Column award winning Director Chris Robinson assembled a visually appealing cast of recognizable types with well-defined comic skills.  The “big” role in the play (played by a disgusted and resentful Jack Lemmon in the 1963 movie version) is that of a lecherous San Francisco landlord named Hogan and requires an actor who can tread the fine line between predatory opportunism and teddy bear vulnerability. Hogan appeals to and seduces a parade of ladies who rent apartments from him, using a carefully assembled bag of hackneyed tricks, predictable macho attire (including a garish, diabolical red suit) and what he clearly considers playboy charm with a much practiced boyish grin. He makes a continuously overbearing pest and fool of himself. Yet he exudes a sort of naïve cuddliness that allows him to gain entry to lots of pre-AIDS concerned boudoirs and makes him, almost unbelievably, a genuine sympathetic character.

It feels as though the role was written for regional comic talent Shane Strawbridge who bounds into it with delicious abandon. He balances both sides of his over the top character like a master juggler, using impeccably delivered comic timing and irrepressible positive energy. The audience can hardly wait to see what sort of new ‘attack’ he launches each time he sneaks or bursts onstage, into the apartment of one of his former conquests. Said former conquest, Irene, re-emerges and manages to inadvertently rekindle passionate flames as a sultry subtext to the main romantic plot. In a role that would look perfectly suited to a youngish Ann Bancroft, director Robinson has cast statuesque, glamorous blonde Staci Cook. Her glare could turn lesser men than Hogan to stone; her voice would command order from a division of randy Marines after a six months assignment on a deserted island. Tossing off pre-women’s lib one-liners like yesterday’s cigarette ashes, she creates the perfect match for Strawbridge’s Hogan and is equally relentless in her narcissistic invasion of the other two characters’ private lives. Local actress Jill Etheridge, pixie and vivacious to the point of hyperactivity, plays the show’s ingénue, Robin. With foreshadowing of the commitment-phobic 70’s, she debates marrying her honorable, devoted, handsome boyfriend. Maybe she should just live with him? And no sex…she’s a proper young lady, after all. As the sole ‘straight’ character in the show, regional leading man Keith Warren cuts a dashingly Cary Grant-wholesome picture as clean cut junior executive Dave trying to repress his natural desires while accommodating his insecure girlfriend’s unreasonable wishes. With the wildly randy behavior erupting around him and Hogan’s non-stop determination to offer him unwelcome ‘conquest advice’, Warren’s Dave struggles valiantly to take control of the situation with hilarious result. Warren’s “adult” delivery and droll expression works well in contrast to Strawbridge’s camped up, juvenile-acting Hogan and makes the romantic pursuit of his scatterbrained ingénue girlfriend really fun to watch. The 60’s costumes are perfect in detail and pastel color scheme (designed by Patsy Daussat). The multi-level chic San Francisco high rise flat makes an ideal playground for the sex-crazed foursome (Dennis Canright design with props by Ryan Mathieu Smith); and the 60’s romantic ballads as background sound provide an ideal torchy ambience (Wendy Bowman).

Feeling nostalgic and a trifle risqué? Under the Yum Yum Tree is the groovy scene to make. Dine out in downtown Grapevine before the show at one of its varied, sophisticated options— it’s a perfect date evening that could lead to…whoever knows what later on?
Under the Yum Yum Tree runs through June 7 at 8:00PM Fridays and Saturdays, 3:00PM on Sundays.
Runway Theatre
215 North Dooley Street
Grapevine, Texas 76051
(817) 488-4842
www.runwaytheatre.com

Posted in Theatre Reviews | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Heavenly Audacity: T3 Lost in the Stars

Posted by sjamaanka on 26 May 2009

In his 1949 Broadway opening-night review of Kurt Weill’s Lost in the Stars, New York Times critic Brooks Atkinson commented: “Mr. Weill has given the theatre some fine scores, but… it is difficult to remember anything out of his portfolio as eloquent as this richly orchestrated singing music… overflowing with the same compassion that Mr. Paton brought to his novel…. The music is deep, dramatic, and beautiful.” In Theatre Three’s current production of Lost in the Stars, set main stage in the round at the Quadrangle, the entire ensemble struggles on occasion to master the near operatic challenge the complex score presents. No matter. The soaring eloquence of the music and its sincere expression of the collective human soul’s heart-felt desire for universal acceptance and transcendence allow Theatre Three’s talented, diverse acting ensemble to reach a superb performance level in spite of any vocal technique shortcomings. Their rawness adds veracity to the score’s richness and contemporary potency to the production. The audience exults in the hauntingly expressive music, while treading every anguished step alongside the main character Stephen Kumalo in his Orpheus-like descent to Hell and back. It’s transformative, enriching theatre in an accessible modern vernacular.

Cedric Neal, Akin Babatunde, Liz Mikel

Cedric Neal, Akin Babatunde, Liz Mikel

Talk about hope-filled audacity. Some vision composer Kurt Weill and lyricist Maxwell Anderson must have had in 1949 to create and mount a musical stage adaptation of Alan Paton’s disturbingly realistic 1948 apartheid novel Cry, the Beloved Country.  What musical swept the Tony awards in 1949? Cole Porter’s Kiss Me Kate, hardly in the same league as far as provocative social commentary goes. How could Weill/Anderson have expected their show to go on tour in 1949? Where could they have fed and housed a bi-racial cast in segregated America, the land of separate but equal drinking fountains, hotels and restaurants? What race-related roadblocks must they have faced even in mounting the show in the “enlightened” New York of that day? And where at that time would they find a substantial number of African-American singers versed in operatic-dimensioned expression to fully realize the major roles? Weill must have planned carefully. As his lead Stephen Kumalo, he cast the incomparable operatic baritone and actor Todd Duncan, the first African-American to sing with a major opera company (1945), and the first black person to sing in an opera with an otherwise white cast (the New York City Opera). Duncan was quite the outspoken desegregation advocate. While playing Porgy in Gershwin’s Porgy and Bess during the show’s 1936 Washington run at the National Theatre, he led the cast in a protest of the theatre’s policy of segregation. Duncan declared that he “would never play in a theater which barred him from purchasing tickets to certain seats because of his race.” Management succumbed to his demands and allowed the first integrated performance at the National Theatre. No one on earth could have better brought the plight of Stephen Kumalo to life both vocally and experientially for that first production. Todd Duncan had walked that walk, fought that battle, himself.

How does a modern company cast that pivotal role? Theatre Three features multiple award-winning Akin Babatunde as Stephen Kumalo.  Babatunde brings phenomenal stage presence, reverential compassion and ferocious dignity to his portrayal. Trained at the National Black Theatre in Harlem, he has acted, directed, coached and taught extensively nation-wide and abroad. His   co-written play   Blind Lemon Blues,   has  earned national acclaim, with  his  performance as  Blind lemon receiving  glowing   praise . Accordingly, he brings a gravelly blues sensibility to his song interpretations that makes Kumalo a vivid Everyman dealing with life’s unspeakable horrors. This musical isn’t mounted very often, possibly because it’s hard to cast. With Babatunde as lead, Theatre Three not only bypasses the inherent casting challenge, it transforms the show to reach today’s audience head on. Could Theatre Three have found a stronger African-American operatic singer for the Kumalo role today? Undoubtedly. Would he have brought the show as effectively to life in the era of “Yes, We Can” as Babatunde with his soulful blues intonations and common man demeanor? Probably not.

The rest of the ensemble creates unforgettable, transformational moments as well. Liz Mikel’s raunchy fun “Who’ll Buy” kicks Act I into high gear, while her stirring, heartfelt rendition of “Cry, the Beloved Country” in Act II warrants an extended encore. TeCo Theatrical Productions’ trained young artist Raliegh “Tre” Jones delights the audience in his cameo solo “Big Mole”. The tragic role of Stephen Kumalo’s son Absolom seems tailor-made for Dallas Theater Center resident actor/singer Cedric Neal. His soaring rendition of “The Wild Justice “ in Act II expresses such vivid contrast in bright and dark tones that it shines a poignant light on the relentless determination of his father Stephen Kumalo to find resolution and salvation as much as it reveals his character’s inner conflict. Neal’s Absolom never begs for mercy; his honesty brings on his death while providing redemptive inspiration for all lives he touches. The father’s single-minded dignity is mirrored in the son, although their life paths carry them far apart. Through Absolom’s committed resolve the audience, along with Stephen Kumalo, are no longer “lost in the stars.” Through Weill’s music all are transported to that grace-filled magical place.

Lost in the Stars, dealing with the most serious subject matter of any show currently running in the region, delivers its message of reconciliation through loss with a powerful musical wallop. It matches our times of hope and challenge, warrants attendance by all who believe that great theater can inspire transformation as well as provide exquisite entertainment.

Theatre Three’s production of Kurt Weill’s Lost in the Stars runs through June 14.
Tickets: 214.871.3300 (p)
option #1: box office
option #2: administration
option #3: direct sales
ADMIN: admin@theatre3dallas.com
BOX OFFICE: boxoffice@theatre3dallas.com

Theatre Three, Inc.
2800 Routh Street, #168
Dallas, TX 75201
www.theatre3dallas.com

Posted in Political Commentary, Theatre Reviews | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Indoor/Outdoor: the cat’s pajamas at Water Tower Theatre

Posted by sjamaanka on 25 May 2009

Attributing human thoughts and emotions to feline or canine animal companions can become a suspect and saccharine endeavor. But not always. The folks at Water Tower Theatre should be grinning like Cheshire cats with the regional premiere of Kenny Finkle’s engaging domestic short hair romance Indoor/Outdoor in their main performance space. It’s got them sitting smack dab in the catbird seat.

Jessica Cavanagh Wiggers, Regan Adair: Oristano photo

Jessica Cavanagh Wiggers, Regan Adair: Oristano photo

Indoor/Outdoor had its world premiere in 2004 at the Hangar Theatre in Ithaca, New York and has played to sold out houses on both US coasts.  Finkle, an award-winning graduate of Columbia University’s MFA Playwriting program, started writing the play in 2002. “I had the idea to write a play about my cat (or rather several of the cats I’ve known in my life) for almost a year before this. I thought a play about a cat was a very, very, very bad idea. But the story kept coming back to me.” During the first act, the play feels faintly derivative, almost like a cat lover’s answer to that doggone guaranteed moneymaker Sylvia. Introduced by alpha tabby Samantha (played by earnest, energetic Jessica Cavanagh Wiggers, clad throughout in t-shirt, jeans and tennis shoes), the play chronicles her nine lives’ span filled with anthropomorphic adventures, from whiskers to tail. Lonely codependent geek boy Shuman (created with convincing understatement and dowdy, Hugh Grant-like rumpling by regional comic lion Regan Adair) adopts Samantha from the local shelter to fill a void in his life. Frustrating love and isolation issues result. Act One purrs along at a sit-com predictable rate, entertaining more because of the high caliber of acting and clean staging then the script’s content.  Then the evocative claws come out.

“I realized I wasn’t really writing about my cats at all but that I was writing about my own relationship with my partner and how challenging, thrilling, and surprising that was to me. And so I kept going deeper and deeper.” Enter fang-flashing, New Age animal empath Matilda, with authoritative clairvoyance as portrayed by statuesque, husky-voiced Renee Krapff, and a feral feline amour named Oscar, played by lean, muscular Joey Folsom in his WTT debut with an accent, attitude, wardrobe and physicality that could emerge from the Broadway musical CATS. Folsom’s Oscar struts in un-neutered and unfettered nonchalance, refreshingly straightforward compared to the other three characters. With the second pair’s arrival, Indoor/Outdoor launches into high farce crescendo with surprising emotional depth and unexpected plot twists. Fur flies and impeccable comic timing zings as the four engage in a group counseling “therapy” session conducted by zealot Matilda with mind-boggling intensity. Complications of inter-species communication captivate the full attention of the most catnap prone audience member. It’s delightful. And thought provoking.

WTT director Terry Martin orchestrates superb, balanced ensemble performances from his actors, enlivening four very different characters. Each requires an imaginative leap of faith on the audience’s part to remain credible. Playwright Finkle says, “Indoor/Outdoor for me is about letting go of what the outside world says is right or wrong or how much it’s worth and allowing yourself to trust that you do deserve to love and be loved.” Worldly-wise cats teaching inept humans how it feels to be really human and alive… the play is unequivocally and simply the cat’s pajamas.

Indoor/Outdoor runs through June 7, 2009 at the Addison Theatre Centre, 15650 Addison Road in Addison, Texas.  Performance times are 7:30 PM Wednesdays and Thursdays, Fridays at 8:00 pm, Saturdays at 2:00 PM and 8:00 PM, and Sundays at 2:00 PM.
Tickets: 972.450.6232 or online www.watertowertheatre.org
Scenic design is by Michael Sullivan, lighting design by Jared Land, costumes by Barbara Cox and properties by Tish Mussey.

Quotes from Kenny Finkle excerpted from his production remarks on Burbank, CA’s The Colony Theatre website: http://www.colonytheatre.org/shows/indoorOutdoor.shtml

Posted in Theatre Reviews | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

FETTUCCINE Fake-Out: the 2004 Iowa Presidential Caucus

Posted by sjamaanka on 19 May 2009

I’m from California.  Politics here ranges in spirit and style from Kabuki to Spielberg.  We Golden State folks just recalled a poker-faced career politico, duly elected governor by a reasonable percentage of the population, and replaced him with an inexperienced B-Grade actor who smiles handsomely for the media cameras and can’t pronounce the state’s name.  Not much takes me by surprise, politically speaking.

On January 7, 2004, I boarded AMTRAK in Colfax, CA, joining thirty or so enthusiastic, passionately committed souls of all ages from across the state, heading east on a “Peace Train” to support our Democrat of Choice in the Iowa Presidential Caucus.  We sang patriotic and political songs, swapped diverse life tales and campaign paraphernalia, and discovered how we all shared the same soul-felt vision for world peace and justice embodied by our candidate.  When we arrived in Osceola, Iowa, and shuttled the short distance to Des Moines, we were all eager to stretch our wings and spread the gospel of fearless paradigm change, and to participate in a grassroots, unique aspect of American democracy in action — the Iowa Caucus.

We immersed ourselves in the exploding political scene: canvassing neighborhoods in shifts, endlessly phone calling “undecided’s” and likely supportive “1’s and 2’s” from computer generated precinct lists, penning volumes of personal postcard notes, working coffee receptions and speaking events — and attending caucus training sessions to learn about this upcoming process.  We “grokked” the 15% viability concept and played pretend caucus using musical genres in place of candidates (I lobbied successfully for the “Blues” preference group), learned about last minute voter registration and the sanctity of the 7pm closed-door deadline for inclusion in the official headcount, absorbed what chaos to expect during “re-alignment”, and how to propose resolutions for the state platform.  Most importantly, we learned that as Californians we could observe (but not vote in) the caucuses from the rear of the rooms, wearing our t-shirts and campaign buttons, but not handing out literature nor stumping for our candidate (unless we were publicly elected officials ourselves).  It was made very clear that only Democrats duly registered in the specific precincts would be included in the head count. All participants would have their names checked against a master list upon entering the room and get asked to register immediately and provide verifiable residence if not on the list. It sounded complicated, staff support heavy; but if lots of Iowans regularly participate in the caucus process, I figured it must work.  Shortly after the caucus I learned that only a tiny percentage of Iowa residents actually participate on a regular basis.

Fresh hopes upon arrival! Observing the hordes of media folk swarming the pre-caucus hubbub, I imagined all Iowa must take part.  In one day, I found myself interviewed by the LA Times, NPR, SF Chronicle, the Christian Science Monitor (quoted on their front page story as an out-of-state volunteer), two radio stations, three alternative weeklies, and a German Internet news reporter.  This worldwide newsworthy event would demonstrate how a large number of American citizens select their presidential delegates in an honest-to-gosh functional grassroots system.  With literally thousands of campaign volunteers like myself pouring in, from many other states, Canada, Europe and Japan, I hoped Iowa residents would feel honored, not overwhelmed, by our presence in support of this first important step of the 2004 Presidential Campaign.

After two days in Des Moines, I was sent to a to a small town near the Minnesota border to assist the single paid campaign staffer for my candidate in a rural county.  Her greatest support appeared to come from a handful of articulate, intelligent college students who canvassed around class schedules and published their own newspaper, which presented the candidates’ opinions on a wide range of issues with more clarity than most major news media. After telephoning what felt like every single possible supporter in the county at least three times, and canvassing quaint neighborhoods solo in single digit and below temperatures for hours on end, I was so ready for the Big Event.

At 6pm on Caucus Night, the campaign coordinator dropped me off at the nearby college with flyers, stickers and placards, ready to observe, oversee and persuade last minute “undecided’s’ entering any of the three designated caucuses in the specific building. An out of state native as well, the coordinator headed off to the caucus located in the precinct where she resided, in hopes of getting counted based on her several months’ Iowa residence.  (I learned later she participated unchallenged.)

The aggressively enthusiastic “Take Back America” mob seemed to be running the event and closely guarded the entrances to all precinct rooms with extra campaign workers.  I set up my campaign materials next to another candidate’s crew, a genuinely genial cluster of southern college lads, who confided privately that they all preferred my candidate’s platform, but as “this senator had paid for their trip to Iowa,” they were working for him.

By 6:30pm, the communal meeting space in the college cafeteria was bedlam. Lines of impatient, frozen people wound everywhere, swathed in parkas and mufflers. People sprawled on chairs and couches to fill out voter registration forms. I loaned out countless pens and found myself asked un-answerable questions about the caucus and registration procedures. If there were any people in charge of the caucus, independent of the one campaign’s staff and volunteers, I never saw them.  As the crowd filed into the three assigned rooms by 7pm, I decided to observe a precinct room where there was no designated captain from my campaign, to cheer on (silently) our supporters there. I moved to the back wall of the room and lowered my large placard as the three college-aged girls caucusing for my candidate stared dejectedly at the obnoxiously loud, sign-waving members of other preference groups hooting and stamping around them. They signaled me to PLEASE join them with panic in their eyes. I felt sure I’d be thrown out summarily, but I couldn’t resist climbing on a chair behind the girls and raising my placard and voice high in support of our peace-loving candidate. No one noticed, or offered objection, or asked to see proof of my Iowa residence. I noticed numbers of people wandering in and out the door randomly, joining one group or another, now way past 7pm.  When the three college girls “re-aligned” with another preference group as instructed, I slipped out the door.

I took a deep breath and dived through the next precinct door, sure I’d be stopped. No one noticed. My presidential preference group here, plentiful and rowdy, waved me down to the middle of the room where I repeated my “Chair-top Performance” of the previous room, much louder this time.  It felt like a San Francisco Peace Rally. Chaos reigned supreme with much posturing and blatant name-calling from several preference groups; heads were re-counted several times, given the ebb and flow of people wandering in and out. I may have been counted in the melee.

Amazed, I decided to try my luck in the third precinct room.  Just as before, my preference group welcomed me, the California voter, with wild abandon, and no one questioned my active presence. Our viability was celebrated with delicious enthusiasm although the hostility and resentment from several non-viable groups was palpable, particularly from the one group who seemed to feel “entitled.”  I almost got counted again, shouting “not me” to avoid inclusion.  At the end, I sauntered out into the lobby very puzzled and then distressed as I realized I could have been counted in all three precincts if I’d chosen to abuse the system (and may have been counted in the second room, anyway). Other people had wandered in and out like me and weren’t challenged. Were they counted? How was this fair and accurate?  Was this scenario an isolated case of lax rule enforcement? Or was this how it always works?  If so, what do the final delegate tallies actually represent as a “legitimate” electoral indicator?

When I got to my candidate’s post-caucus low-key celebration at a local bar-restaurant, I learned to my dismay this sort of “irregularity” had occurred elsewhere. In one precinct, our preference group was viable at first count. After 7pm, a rush of people poured through the door and blended into the crowd. In spite of our group’s precinct captain’s protest, the precinct chair insisted on a recount and that the new undocumented arrivals were “on the honor system” and deemed legitimate.  Suddenly, our group lost viability, as others gained it. Another long-time precinct captain told me she did not recognize half the people who turned up at her caucus location.  When I asked her if the newcomers were checked out or were registered, she shrugged her shoulders, “I hope so; it was too chaotic to know for sure.”  In another precinct, our group was denied viability after “re-alignment”, apparently at the whim of the precinct chair, who supported a different candidate’s group. I wondered if this sort of “caucus irregularity” was happening across the state or just in this one remote locale.

Musing somberly over the questionable fairness of the process and the validity of any so-tallied results about to be blasted worldwide by the nation’s media, I ordered a plate of Fettuccine Alfredo at the bar’s restaurant.  After the third bite, I noticed the food tasted strange. I looked closely at the food in the dim light and saw it was macaroni and cheese.  A metaphorical image flashed in my brain.  The American public and the world ordered and expected high-class fettuccine at the Iowa Caucus but got misled with macaroni and cheese instead.

Why should the public accept this Caucus fake-out any more than a second-rate plate of food masquerading as the real thing?  Send back the food. Demand the truth about a skewed process that in reality represents the preferences of only a very tiny percent of a non-representative, homogeneous population anyway.  No one will ever know who truly won the 2004 Democratic Iowa Caucus — by landslide, by a nose, or by a forkful of macaroni and cheese mash-up. It  became the high point of the 2004 Presidential Campaign for me. As I took the train ride home to California, bone-tired and politically-enlightened, I considered not ordering any more fettuccine. Certainly not in Iowa.

PHOTO: My candidate, Dennis Kucinich, “America’s Most Courageous Congressman”      Visit: www.kucinich.us

http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2009/04/10/dennis-kucinich-where-is-osama-bin-laden/

Posted in Political Commentary | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Spirited tragedy: Sundown Collaborative’s OTHELLO

Posted by sjamaanka on 18 May 2009

Attending a production of Shakespeare’s Othello is like watching a high profile match between two of the world’s greatest prizefighters. Its success depends on the relationship of its two main characters, no matter who else exists in the play or how it’s produced. Othello v. Iago: a classic battle between the soul of integrity and the heart of darkness begins and ends with these two.othello.sundown.09

Sundown Collaborative in Denton is a fledgling theatre company with vision firmly focused on an honest prize – the creative realization of genuine art. The company’s production values and amenities are minimal, the faithful exploration and enactment of its chosen theatrical text exemplary. In their current modern dress adaptation of Othello the dynamic, convoluted, enmeshed relationship created by Andrew Aguilar in the title role and Sean Ball as his ensign Iago rivet the audience’s attention from unsettling start to chaotic finish.

Aguilar is a stocky, broad-shouldered actor with a commanding, patrician presence and vibrant, healthy aspect. It’s easy to imagine him as a noble Moorish general, equally at ease in command of his soldiers or genially circulating at Venetian state affairs where his dark complexion would lend exotic appeal and gain female admirers. In contrast, Sean Ball is a slight man, fair haired and pale complexioned. His agitated awkwardness and homespun speech patterns immediately establish him as a lower class, opportunist grunt. He’s exceedingly ambitious, frustrated to obsessive rage by Othello’s promotion of career soldier-bureaucrat Cassio (played with convincing workmanlike soldierly demeanor by Drew Maggs) to a position of authority instead of his more worthy self.  Ball’s Iago weaves his revenge plot, entrapping the unsuspecting Othello, with chilling, credible precision. Ball creates Iago as a man who advances his interests by masterful manipulation and narcissistic will. He’s venial, predatory, reptilian, a conjurer of evil subterfuge. He dances around Othello like a feral beast silently stalking its prey, priming the precise moment to sink his fangs in with dissembling guile. Aguilar plays Othello as grounded and logical, a straightforward leader who sets high conduct standards for himself and expects his soldiers to follow suit without question. Blind to the target he makes of himself, Aguilar’s Othello never suspects Iago’s treason; it’s just not in his noble nature. The fine-tuned symbiosis between these actors exhibits a level of nuance and sophistication that would be admirable in performances by more mature, experienced actors. Both men are currently UNT students; their portrayals are solid accomplishments and reflect as well on director/ adapter and recent UNT graduate David Hanna.

In his director notes, Hanna says, “We had to look for a common truth between Shakespeare’s present and our own…to make Othello our own. Our Othello parallels the current conflict in the Middle East, not to take a political stand, but to connect Shakespeare’s tragedy to our own time.” Hanna believes the play’s essential emotion, unbridled jealousy, drives all the action and its resulting destruction. He keeps his main actors focused on their internal emotional struggles and allows the action to explode forth naturally as logical result of their pent up, conflicting motives and desires. The surging ebb and flow, reflective moments smacked up hard against fast-played scenes of intense physical violence, keep the play far from any static declamatory ambience.

The balance of Hanna’s cast, most UNT students and some in first stage appearances, work effectively as an ensemble.  Lauren Rosen gives a particularly haunting performance as the doomed Desdemona, revealing strength and passion along with brave resignation as her death approaches. Hers is no simple ingénue portrayal. Cody Lucas as Desdemona’s dim-witted, petulant suitor, the secondary character Roderigo, mirrors Iago’s overblown jealousy on a diminutive scale, bringing out its ludicrous, petty aspects and contrasting with the deeper tragedies of the deaths of Othello and Desdemona. Lucas captures the essence of his pitiful character, even with limited stage time or lines.
Occasionally the modernized adaptation bogs down in translation or the background sound/music overpowers the actors’ voices. Small complaints about a valid effort to bring a major tragedy triumphantly to life on stage.  Sundown Collaborative strives “to provoke thought and incite discussion”; their Othello warrants much contemplation and spirited exchange.

Othello continues Wednesday May 20, Thursday May 21 and Friday May 22 at 8pm
Greenspace Arts Collective
529 Malone Denton, TX 76201
www.sundowntheatre.com

CAST:
Othello: Andrew Aguilar
Iago: Sean Ball
Desdemona: Lauren Rosen
Emilia: Kristy Riffle
Cassio: Drew Maggs
Roderigo: Cody Lucas
Duchess/Bianca: Sarah Dowling
Montano: Ben Darling
Lodovico: Sam Harless
Brabanzio: Daniel Tuttel

Music & Sound:

Prelude – “Black Betty” by Nick Cave
going into II.i – “4th of July” by Soundgarden
II.ii (party) – “Yu-Gung (Remix)
going into III.i – “Is She Weird?” by The Pixies
III.iii (marriage ceremony) – “Lux Aeterna/Convergence” by Johnny Greenwood
opening Act 2 – “Wings Off Flies” by Nick Cave
IV.ii – “Falshgeld
V.i (fight scene) – “Ich Bins”
red scene in V.ii – “Tropar”
Curtain Call – “Mea Culpa” by Brian Eno and David Byrne

Posted in Theatre Reviews | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

All aboard: NIBROC Trilogy at Theatre Three

Posted by sjamaanka on 12 May 2009

Seize the day. Brighter than any star and living often in larger than life terms, barely into their twenties, the Greatest Generation possessed an intangible and incomparable grace. Courage, vision, honoring one’s word, a pro-active work ethic: they not only understood the importance of integrity and character, they seized every opportunity presented to live lives that would reflect well on future choices. They seemed to realize they were key players at a crucial moment in Western history—all civilization held its breath as these energetic young people shouldered enormous responsibilities and made sacrifices that would provide a much better, safer world for future generations. They would not let evil and repression flourish. They knew that things really worth having were worth waiting for, would be better cherished if cultivated slowly, with respect. So it would go when they strolled down the path of true love.

May and Raleigh view the future

May and Raleigh view the future

Live this experience of innocent, hopeful Greatest Generation love blossoming into passionate commitment when May and Raleigh meet and stroll down that sometimes thorny path together. Lead characters in Arlene Hutton’s celebrated romantic comedy trio of plays The NIBROC Trilogy, playing currently at Theatre Three’s intimate space Theatre Too, they don’t just make you fall in love with them vicariously; you’ll want to host their wedding shower, attend the marriage vows and fete them at the reception. Echo Theatre mounted the trilogy earlier this year at Dallas’ eclectic Bath House Cultural Center, where it had such enthusiastic response from audiences, many of whom came back repeatedly and filled the houses to capacity, that it made sense to mount a second run where new audiences could find solace and delight in its homespun freshness.

Fresh? A WWII romance? Isn’t that stodgy and old-fashioned? Hutton’s play Last Train to NIBROC, the first of the trilogy, tingles with such vitality you can almost smell and taste the strawberries Raleigh mentions bringing to supper at his sweetheart May’s family’s home. How many plays make your senses come that alive? There’s magic in the vibrant, multi-faceted portrayals created by Morgan Justiss as May and Ian Sinclair as Raleigh. Assuredness, ease and focus mark their characterizations in this second mounting. Not that they gave superficial performances before, but now Justiss and Sinclair know every nuance of each other’s character like longtime friends. No reflective pause gets rushed; every high emotional moment peaks in delicate crescendo, revealing their mastery as performers, the guiding caress of Pam Myers-Morgan and Ellen Locy’s direction, and the considerable genius of Arlene Hutton’s script.

All three plays flow naturally, viewed in sequence; or they can be enjoyed seen alone. The characters are minutely detailed with complex relationships that function as believable catalysts for action that swells and falls with the poetic grace of Edward Albee’s works minus any savage motivations. These are real people, humble, decent folk; you find yourself caring about every one of them.  May, Raleigh, May’s optimistic mother Mrs. Gill, Raleigh’s cantankerous mother Mrs. Brummett, and his willful sister Treva who shifts everyone into the second half of the twentieth century at lightning speed; they become old friends instantly. It’s no accident they make such strong impressions.

Arlene Hutton knows her craft from the ground up. She started performing at age 8 in her home state of Kentucky and went on to earn an MFA at the prestigious Asolo Conservatory in Florida. From there she moved to New York, like so many aspiring performers, where she got daytime television and costuming gigs and eventually earned an Equity card.  Since that time she has taught, lectured, and thrived as a guest artist at over fifty respected universities, conferences and professional/ academic venues worldwide, as a director, actor and writer. Hutton was named the Tennessee Williams Playwriting Fellow at the University of the South in both 2005/2006 and 2007/2008. She fell into playwriting in 1994, frustrated by the lack of dynamic, worthwhile roles for women. She immersed herself in the creative process, participating in a transformational Lanford Wilson retreat that influenced her NIBROC series in development. She took her writing to the Edinburgh Fringe Festival four times before Last Train to NIBROC first graced the stage on a tiny, tucked-away venue at the 1996 Festival in a short one-act version with The Journey Company, with two people in its first audience. “When I first wrote about May and Raleigh, it never occurred to me that anyone would be interested in what seemed to be an old-fashioned romance. I never really expected the piece to be produced; it was just some dialogue rattling in my head, demanding to be put on paper, one of my first attempts at writing a play,” she explains. She modeled the two main characters on her parents and their experiences , drawn from Appalachian family lore. “The plot is fiction; the details are fact.” After multiple revisions flowing from intense creative immersion, the fully realized first leg of the trilogy premiered  at the  New York Fringe Festival in 1998. It returned to Edinburgh, with its original cast, and played in a large venue to sold out houses. The production then moved to Off-Broadway, where it received a prestigious Best Play nomination from the New York Drama League. Last Train to NIBROC has delighted audiences at more than one hundred productions worldwide, including at Fort Worth’s Circle Theatre in 2002.
After the first production’s success, Hutton realized the characters had a bigger story to tell. She wrote the character of Raleigh’s mother for a longtime friend who had supported the play’s development since its earliest fringe incarnation.  The second part of the trilogy, See Rock City, where May’s and Raleigh’s mothers join the young couple, began as a fifteen page ‘wedding scene’, and the characters got fleshed out with in depth exploration at improvisational workshops. With the help of a development grant, she added two more scenes and got to continue working with the original Journey Company actors for a full year of rehearsals and readings, an almost unheard of luxury. See Rock City finally came together at the Australian National Playwrights Conference in 2003. Hutton wrote and conducted workshops of the final play in the trilogy Gulf View Drive at the New Harmony Project. The complete trilogy premiered in Los Angeles and played Off-Broadway at the 78th Street Theatre Lab in 2007. It received unanimously positive reviews and was named Critics’ Choice by every major publication, including the LA Times. It received six LA Weekly Theatre Award nominations, including Best Playwriting.

This is your best chance to get aboard for Hutton’s triumphant trilogy, its “last train” in Dallas for a while. The Dallas cast includes some of the most versatile performers in the region: Kristin McCollum as Treva, Susan McMath Platt as Mrs. Brummett, Nancy Munger as Mrs. Gill and Morgan Justiss and Ian Sinclair as May and Raleigh. Echo Theatre founding/producing partners Ellen Locy and Pam Myers-Morgan direct. Come seize the day for May and Raleigh, with hope and honor, integrity and joy.  Step out of our complex difficult present day world; get inspired in NIBROC to seek a more positive future.

Catch the trilogy: Thursdays through Sundays through May 31 at Theatre Three’s Theatre Too, 2800 Routh Street in Dallas’ The Quadrangle.
Tickets: 214-871-3300, www.theatre3dallas.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

River of Ponies

Posted by sjamaanka on 10 May 2009

Exactly how I became known as “the pony lady”, I’ll never know.  It was never my intention.  I considered my enterprising twenty-something self a serious trainer of horses. Horses. When I flung open my barn doors for business, I posted professionally designed, informative flyers advertising nationally certified riding lessons, coaching and schooling at all county feed and tack stores. I handed out handsomely printed business cards with an embossed HORSE logo (certainly not a pony) to contacts across the region. I proudly nailed an attractive wooden sign to the front gate of my small north Texas farm, featuring a full-sized graphic of a horse. Not a pony. To my dismay, ponies appeared. They came at first as an occasional dribble, then a steady stream. Finally, like a river, a regular flood, of ponies….

With The Sandman, 1984

With The Sandman, 1984

All sizes, types, ages and temperaments trooped solemnly down my driveway, past the full-sized horse sign, possessing unique, unforgettable traits. There were sway-backed, eagle-eyed broodmares who kicked so swiftly and accurately they could smash two by fours like toothpicks while placidly chewing a mouthful of hay. In crept exquisitely refined ponies with royal pedigrees and sad, doe-soft eyes, cringing in mortal terror at normal daily use of barn rakes, shovels and wheelbarrows. Up trotted the tiniest of ponies with trusting souls, manes ensnarled in mud and blood-stiffened nylon clothesline, wearing old rope halters that scarred deep grooves in their kindly faces. Cresty-necked palominos with jolly round bellies, curly manes and painfully foundered hooves limped on eggshells down the lane. High-stepping blood bays with four white matching socks and blazed faces with profuse, jet-black tails floating gracefully behind them paraded in. Ancient ponies with barbed wire scars crisscrossing their stubby legs and shoulders shuffled by, wise eyes beneath furrowed brows missing nothing. I welcomed them all as temporary residents, en route to humane, use-appropriate homes. Included in the wealth of beautiful, sad, heart-wrenching cases descending upon my “horse ranch” plodded a few incorrigible rogues, ponies who seemed impossible to “fix” and place. Invisible horrors carved deep grooves on their hearts.  Among the latter was Surprise.
A stocky black and white pinto, coarse muscled, thick necked, with a mangy, matted tail and unruly bristle of mane, Surprise sauntered placidly out of a long-neglected, open-topped single horse rig and into my life one sun-washed, wisteria fragrant late spring day. He surveyed the serene farm scene with unruffled reserve, one long ear swiveling casually back and forth. North Texas’ tornado season had already come and gone; this short, fat equine whirlwind slipped as an unassuming afterthought, sans warning.
“This here good-lookin’ pony, he’s too much for ma’ grandkids to handle, needs a firm hand an’ a world of sweaty saddle blankets—I heard you’re the one to fix him real good, little lady. So I brung him.” The elderly gent grinned broadly while scratching his scruffy beard stubble. Before I could change my mind he stuffed my proffered three hundred dollars in cash (negotiated down from five hundred) into his sweaty hatband and lumbered back into his rusty Ford pick up. As I watched him disappear down the lane, empty trailer banging and clanging along behind, I could just make out his parting words over the whine of stiffly shifting gears.  “Sometimes he bucks.”
Surprise’s ground manners proved to be impeccable. He led like on military parade, tied like a statue, reveled in a bath and politely offered his hooves for picking out. He didn’t hog his food or fight with pasture mates. He accepted a snaffle bit in his mouth gladly and obeyed verbal cues while circling me at the end of a schooling rope like any model trustworthy lesson pony. After several days of easing him into the work routine, I decided it was time to check out his behavior under saddle.
One morning soon after Surprise’s arrival I invited a neighbor colleague over for coffee with her nephew in tow. A gangly, athletic teen-ager, Gary helped his aunt with barn chores and routinely climbed up on “green” Quarter horse two year olds for the first few unsteady rides.  My friend had agreed it would be amusing to watch him ride Surprise the first time. Gary was humiliated. He was used to climbing up on full-sized Quarter horses with hot racehorse and champion roping blood coursing through their veins. What could possibly challenge him in riding one sleepy-looking black and white fatso who didn’t even reach as high as his waist? Gary slouched sullenly out to my round riding pen next to the main barn, where a saddled and bridled Surprise waited, snoozing in the sun, a back hoof cocked, tail swishing lazily in the breeze. I handed Gary the reins, instructing him to walk and trot both directions in the small pen, check out gait smoothness and responsiveness to standard cues, see how reliable Surprise’s ‘whoa” was. The basics. No need to canter.  Gary rolled his eyes and grunted assent. His aunt and I retreated indoors to my kitchen, where we could observe the trial ride from a large picture window and sip coffee out of earshot. As I stirred milk into my steaming cup, I recalled the pony’s previous owner’s parting words. ” Sometimes he bucks.”
Aside from the fact that Gary’s legs hung down so long they almost scraped the ground with his boot toes, the first try-out proceeded in perfectly ordinary fashion, reflecting Surprise’s excellent ground attitude. The pony meandered along at a snail’s pace walk, halted obediently, neck-reined in figure-eight loops, even backed up without fussing, gaping his mouth or tossing his head.  He looked bored. Gary glanced up at his aunt and me standing in the kitchen window and stuck out his tongue. I yelled, “Wake him up! He’s half-asleep! Pick up a trot!” Gary shrugged and curled his knees up and kicked the pony’s flanks with his heels. Gently.  Surprise swiveled an over-sized ear in response and continued to plod, plod, plod.  Gary kicked him again, more emphatically.  The pony pricked both ears decidedly forward.
My coffee cup halted halfway to my mouth. With the speed and efficiency of a high-powered slingshot, Surprise ducked his head and launched the unsuspecting Gary far across the riding pen. His aunt and I whooped in unison. It was a “surprising” feat. Surprise then halted and waited, unflappably gazing past the barn. Gary crawled slowly to his feet, dusting off his brand new Levis and muttering a few choice words to cover his acute embarrassment. He hardly ever got tossed off his aunt’s high-spirited Quarter Horse colts…. He glanced up at us standing at the window bug-eyed and stuck out his tongue again when we both gave him the ‘thumbs up” to remount. “Ride ‘em, cowboy!” his aunt snickered.  I took another sip of coffee and said with a straight face, “I guess he does buck sometimes.”
Over the next half-hour my friend and I polished off a large pot of coffee, while we observed Surprise demolishing any hope of his ever becoming a trustworthy child’s mount. He tossed the now sweaty, despondent and dust-coated Gary no fewer than twenty times. No matter how hard Gary worked to stay astride, Surprise’s calculated skill at unseating him persevered whenever Gary asked him to pick up a trot. When Gary finally dragged his beaten, bruised ego out of the round pen, Surprise had barely broken a sweat under the saddle blanket. I had to hand it to the pony. What he did, he did to perfection. But what could I do with him if he wasn’t safe to ride beyond a walk? He’d make a high maintenance lawnmower.
Surprise’s impeccable ground manners continued to make him a delightful pony to handle on the ground. I invited Gary back several times for a re-match. On each occasion Surprise ditched him with the same determined gusto when encouraged to move out of a walk. It foreshadowed a dim future for one incorrigible, fat black and white pony.
Then I got a phone call from a recent Dallas transplant to my rural corner of Collin County. Mark McMillan, congenial and earnest, inquired about riding lessons for his adopted special needs son Tyler, who was developmentally disabled. Tyler did not fit the profile of my average riding student—he was male, highly excitable, and possessed the physical coordination of a six-year-old child (in an eleven year old body), and worse, the emotional maturity of someone considerably younger. I was neither trained for nor particularly interested in providing riding instruction for the developmentally disabled.  But Mark McMillan insisted. He hoped to introduce his adopted son to as many elements of the natural, country life as possible. Including horses. Reluctantly, I agreed to allow the man to bring Tyler for a trial visit.  If all went well, I would agree to let the boy pet and brush a horse a short while, up close. Maybe.
The risk of the challenge I’d agreed to hit me hard. Whatever horse I selected to allow Tyler near had to be utterly dependable and unflappable. It couldn’t make one false move to frighten or injure this fragile young boy. McMillan had mentioned that Tyler was easily intimidated and hypersensitive. I worried that a full sized horse might frighten him badly. As I walked through my small herd of normal-sized lesson horses, I realized not one of them was the right size. My gaze fell upon Surprise, dreamily munching his grass hay in the last stall in the barn, ears just visible over the stall door.  I slid the door back and stood beside him tugging my fingers through his unruly mane. “Looks like you’re it, buddy, it’s your turn to shine.“ Surprise sneezed and rubbed a bony eye socket vigorously on my leg. “Don’t you dare let me down.“
The next day Tyler and his father arrived right after lunch and immediately confirmed my concerns. Tyler was slight, awkward, gestured oddly with his hands and uttered random grunts and whoops as he got out of the car. He shook like a leaf, hooted and clung to his dad as we slowly approached horses sunning themselves behind a pasture fence. Any sudden movement or sound—a stamped hoof or casual head shake or swished tail— elicited a piercing shriek from the boy, and he buried his face on his dad’s pant-leg. The idea of trying to introduce Tyler to a horse up close, hands-on, any horse, seemed ill conceived. I expressed my concern to Mr. McMillan, who looked mournful and patted Tyler’s head.  Then I noticed Surprise observing us intently, nostrils flared, over the rim of his stall door, ears pricked tautly forward.
I motioned them to follow me down the barn aisle and carefully rolled the door open partway. Mr. McMillan managed to pry Tyler’s face away from his pant leg long enough for the boy to glimpse the pony watching him intently just inside the stall door. I knelt next to the opening and whispered, “Here’s someone who wants to be your friend. This is Surprise.” Tyler blinked timidly at the hairy black and white muzzle looming over him, ready to bolt. Surprise didn’t budge but softly blew into Tyler’s hair with a gentle “whoosh”. Two or three tense seconds passed. A delighted grin spread across Tyler’s face. He cautiously reached out a hand, stiff and quaking, flapping it in the general direction of the pony’s face. Then Tyler whistled, crammed his fist in his mouth, and hid his face on his dad’s leg again. Surprise’s gaze never left the boy as I haltered and stepped him back a few paces so we could all enter the stall.
From a small red bucket I pulled out a child-sized red rubber curry brush and started rubbing it in wide, overly slow circles on Surprise’s neck and shoulders. Tyler watched the process intently, then let go of his dad and tried to grab the curry and stuff it in his mouth. I guided his hand towards Surprise, helping him brush the pony’s neck. Tyler grinned again and gurgled, seemed fascinated by the physical contact.  I repeated the procedure with a soft brush on Surprise’s face and handed it to Tyler. When he inadvertently poked Surprise in the eye with the brush, I firmly caught his hand and said “No-no, OUCH!”  I stroked Tyler’s face with the brush to show him how it felt and worked. He made a face, chortled, and turned back to the pony, ignoring his dad completely for the first time. Tentatively, he brushed a few more strokes on the pony’s cheek, repeating, “No-no ouch” to himself, then brushed his own cheek again and giggled. I felt we had made enormous strides, even as I rescued the brush from Tyler’s mouth yet again. It seemed enough for a first visit.
When I announced it was time to go, Tyler whimpered. He stared at the pony, astonished, when I told him Surprise was very, very tired and needed a nap. I asked him to give Surprise a kiss good-bye so the pony would feel loved. He stared at Surprise, serious and still. In a flash Tyler puckered his lips and smacked loudly on Surprise’s nose. The pony’s eyes opened full wide, and the two misfits held each other’s gaze for several seconds. The connection was clear. Suddenly embarrassed, Tyler buried his face once more on his dad’s leg. I asked quietly if he’d like to come back to visit Surprise again. Tyler’s response was muffled and unintelligible but definitely affirmative. At their car, I breathed a huge sigh of relief as Mr. McMillan and I congratulated each other on a successful first session. “What a marvelous pony you have, so well-behaved!” he exclaimed. I nodded, straight-faced, and thanked him. I watched their car retreat down the lane, chewing on my lower lip, and returned to the stall to gather Surprise and turn him loose in the nearby pasture with the other lesson stock. The pony was dozing again, wearing his usual droopy-lidded, bored expression. During the short, intense visit, he never took his then wide-open eyes off Tyler. It made me wonder.
Surprise’s sessions with Tyler continued to delight and amaze all involved. Tyler became bolder and more engaged, more at ease around Surprise, with each short lesson. Surprise perked up whenever Tyler appeared, when he heard the boy’s voice. Something clearly remarkable was happening. A skeptical realist, Tyler’s mother came to witness the nascent, unique relationship she’d heard described in glowing terms by her husband. She was as equally impressed with the obvious attachment growing between the boy and pony as she was with Tyler’s increasing dexterity and improved skill retention elsewhere. She gave us her blessings (and permission), and Tyler’s grooming sessions with Surprise lengthened.
It felt like the right time for Tyler to get on Surprise’s back. After grooming, I showed Tyler how to tack up properly with a youth-sized Western saddle. I demonstrated safe mounting and dismounting technique several times, slowly, and took a deep breath. He watched, but did he really understand? I was treading unfamiliar ground but willing to let the boy and pony explore their growing bond further. As a safety precaution I wrapped a chain attached to a stout leather lead across Surprise’s face, just below his bridle noseband. I frowned at the pony, staring directly into his eye. While Tyler gave his dad an effervescent pre-mounting hug, I growled,” You make one wrong move, Surprise, you’ll regret it.”
I stood directly behind Tyler as we both faced across Surprise’s back.  I curled his hands around the saddle horn. It took several attempts to convince him he needed to hold on tight, not let his hands slide off the horn.  On the count of one-two-three, I boosted him up across the pony’s broad back. Tyler found himself sitting tall and proud on top of Surprise, hands clasped tightly on the horn, huge grin on his face.  Surprise stood like a dignified statue, arching his thick neck and swiveling a mulish ear as if to telegraph reassurance to Tyler. Exhilarated, I remembered to keep breathing. I pried one of his tightly clenched fists off the horn, urging Tyler to stroke Surprise’s neck. He cooperated shakily and whispered, “Good boy! Good S’pwize!”, enthralled. We inched forward a few tentative steps, with my one hand gripping Tyler’s thigh while the other guided Surprise. They looked made for each other, and Tyler’s grin widened. Surprise was completely relaxed, attentive and obedient. We expanded our inching along to strolling several small circles.  Piece of cake. Tyler’s mounted lesson Number One was a major triumph for all involved.
Tyler’s dismount from the pony’s back proved to be a daunting challenge.  His coordination and sense of self-preservation were severely limited. He trusted me and Surprise completely, so when I said, “It’s time to get down now,” Tyler immediately let go of everything, whooped and tumbled in a relaxed heap under Surprise, staring goofily up at the pony’s belly from underneath him in the dirt. He slid off so fast I couldn’t catch him, and Mr. McMillan froze stiff in horror. My heart leaped to my throat. Before I could bark “whoa” and pull the pony up sharp, Surprise showed his true mettle. With utmost care, he stepped well clear of Tyler, disengaging cautiously one hoof at a time. He bent his muzzle down to Tyler’s face and blew a soft “whoosh”, to reassure the prone boy.  Tyler lay there on his back, wiggling, giggling and stroking at Surprise’s muzzle with total delight.  Uncannily, Surprise knew exactly what to do. Mr. McMillan’s eyes met mine. We felt we had witnessed a unique moment: two very different species reached out across the murky chasm of hit and miss communication and found a common language. I got goose bumps. My respect for one incorrigible pony ratcheted up a notch.
The close relationship between Tyler and Surprise continued to blossom. Tyler came to visit and ride more often, even learned to assist some with saddling. I discovered that he paid much better attention when his parents were not in sight, so Mr. McMillan disappeared around the barn regularly. Tyler had moments when the casual observer might not guess he was “different.” Dismounting safely continued to be an issue. I concluded that Tyler enjoyed sliding off Surprise like a rag-doll and landing on his back underneath the pony. Surprise never lost patience, expertly extracted his feet every time and never once stepped on him. If ever a pony adored a child, Surprise loved Tyler. The feeling was deeply and clearly reciprocated.
Sometime during this initial lesson period, I determined that Surprise pulled a cart nicely, even trotting on command, minus any tendencies to buck. Tyler was so taken with the idea of driving Surprise (“I can see him, I can see him!” he crowed), we expanded his lessons to include driving. The three of us wheeled all over the farm and up and down the gravel road in front, sometimes with Surprise at a smart trot. Tyler felt Surprise needed serenading. We must have presented quite a picture as we toured the vicinity with Tyler singing merrily along to his friend, completely off key and unintelligible. Surprise telegraphed his signature ear swivel and continued to maneuver circles and figure eight loops with measured dignity.
Before Christmas, I had a serious discussion with Tyler’s parents. It concluded with them buying Surprise and arranging for him to come home. What an incredible, special day for Tyler when I drove up with my truck and trailer, bearing one black and white Christmas “Surprise”, along with the pony’s brushes, cart and harness. Tyler stood speechless on his driveway, not taking his eyes off Surprise, who began eagerly grazing on the front lawn. Tyler touched me softly on the cheek, then put his hand over his mouth and hurried over to Surprise to stroke his face with the same gentle touch. He went back and forth between us several times, shaking his head, to make sure we were 100% real. He finally stopped and sighed, “MY S’pwize!” I gave Tyler a big hug and answered, “Yes, YOURS….” I could not have imagined a better fate for the pony—he was loved and he knew it. He had a real job, and he loved performing it. No more hopeless and incorrigible. He was home.
I abandoned giving Tyler riding lessons as he neither understood nor respected the need for a safe dismount. I worried that someday Surprise would get distracted and unintentionally hurt his special master. The McMillans accepted Surprise into their family with open arms and took delight in the hours of companionship he provided for Tyler through grooming and driving.  Mr. McMillan took lessons so he could substitute for me in the cart. Tyler enjoyed “showing off” independently for his dad, without me there.  He continued to serenade Surprise, to the dismay of all within earshot.
Tyler had reached his limit in learning, and Surprise doted on the boy in total contentment. I needed to let go. I reminded Mr. McMillan about Surprise’s unfortunate habit of bucking off “normal” riders, warned him against letting anyone else handle or ride Surprise.  Sure enough, several months later I received a sheepish phone call explaining how Dallas relatives with pre-teen children had paid the McMillan family a visit and begged incessantly for rides on ‘that perfect, gentle pony of Tyler’s.” “I was so astonished” Mr. McMillan chuckled, “Surprise launched them across the backyard like he was aiming for Ft. Worth. It won’t happen again.”
I visited Surprise and Tyler occasionally over the next year. Tyler hit a major growth spurt, so it worked out just as well that he drove Surprise instead of riding him. They maintained their intense, loving bond. Mr. McMillan shared with me that he knew Tyler’s increased confidence with tasks and improved communication with his family and peers were a direct result of Surprise being in his life.  I felt so proud of Surprise, honored and thrilled to help discover and develop this worthy niche for the fat little rogue, gratified to know how much of a difference the pony made in Tyler’s life. As for me, his impact was immeasurable. He had opened unexpected, new vistas. I was now very glad to have had such rogue ponies enter my life.
Shortly after, my river of ponies simply dried up and blew away. A few odds-n-ends remained, half-buried in my tack room: a well-worn pair of double ought sized horse shoes rusting on the floor and a petite English bridle with a 4” Kimberwicke bit at the end of my bridle rack. I found myself immersed in the full-blown challenges presented by full-sized horses and their “normal” owners’ interests and needs. The magical promise of professional show barns in California’s expanding horse show scene enticed me away forever from the uncomplicated lifestyle I’d lived as the “pony lady” on a sleepy North Texas horse farm.
I didn’t look back much at the time, or even think to snap photographs of that special duo.  Today, I believe it was no accident that the river of ponies brought Surprise to me, and Tyler to us both. That river led Surprise to a purposeful life he otherwise would have missed, where his latent noble spirit could manifest in spades. Thanks to that river of ponies, I got to witness love’s power in action and to participate in the breathtaking, powerful reality of interspecies communication at its most viable.  I took my fond memories of Surprise and Tyler with me to California, memories that often gave me courage in the face of imposing challenges.  My career in the horse world unfolded, from high desert, iron-gated ranchos outside Riverside in the south to pine and oak-dotted grassy expanses in the Sierra Nevada foothills up north. I will always praise the river of ponies. I still hum a special tune, like Tyler, to honor that one proud, black and white rogue we loved named Surprise.

Short Bio: Alexandra Bonifield spent over thirty years living her life’s passion as a professional horse trainer and nationally certified riding instructor. A former AHSA judge, she was nationally recognized for her work with women and horses on her northern California farm, where she created and ran an arts and equestrian camp for girls. She currently works as a freelance journalist and arts advocate in Dallas, and is an NEA/ Annenberg Fellow in theatre criticism.  Read her reviews at: http://sjamaanka.wordpress.com

Posted in Animalia | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Merry Mayhem: Lyric Stage’s AS THOUSANDS CHEER

Posted by sjamaanka on 5 May 2009

Well before Tom Lehrer, That Was the Week That Was, Laugh-in, the Smothers Brothers, Sonny and Cher and SNL mixed variety show entertainment with political and social commentary to the delight of satire-hungry contemporary audiences, composer/ lyricist Irving Berlin hunkered down with creative writer Moss Hart and came up with a fresh-seeming concept revue requiring a small cast. It was 1933, during the Great Depression. They titled the show they dreamed up As Thousands Cheer. A hit, it ran 400 performances on Broadway, no small feat in hard times.
A Prank Call from the Hoovers to the Roosevelts: Doug Jackson, Diana Sheehan
Lyric Stage possibly chose to mount the production, running through May 9 in the Dupree Theater at the Irving Arts Center, because current economic times seem so déjà vu. It’s an evening of first class, high-energy high jinks and musical numbers that entertain while they gently jab at celebrities and social issues of the day. The pastiche of vignettes consists of sixteen self-contained scenes loosely based on the news, lives and affairs of the rich and famous of the time, including Joan Crawford, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., Noel Coward, Josephine Baker, Mahatma Gandhi and Aimee Semple McPherson. The jokes don’t resonate sharply today, out of context; but the era isn’t so far removed that the cognitive gist of their satire gets lost. It’s smart witty, with a wealth of sophisticated double entendres and innuendos. SNL would do well to take notice.

Dancing, singing and creating the celeb send-ups is a well-balanced cast of six regional professional actors who appear to have as much fun performing as the audience does watching them. The ensemble includes Feleicia Benton, Shannon McGrann, Brian Patrick Hathaway, Doug Jackson, Randy Pearlman and Diana Sheehan. All have well-schooled, tuneful singing voices and harmonize excellently; they enliven their characters with style and clarity — singing, dancing or acting. Director Len Pfluger capitalizes on the unique strengths and complimentary attributes of his diverse cast. The show flows smooth and crisp, never missing a beat nor losing momentum due to set or costume changes or unclear characterizations.

The set defines the common theme tying the vignettes together. Each sketch illustrates different New York Times’ headlines projected on a 1930’s style classical arch transom spanned above the playing space. It’s quaintly nostalgic to view the newspaper motif, realizing it was the major means of communication then. Never depressing, not much takes itself too seriously in this production.

Several vignettes elicit the strongest applause during the evening. In Act I, the song Heat Wave illustrates “Heat Wave Hits New York” with sultry tongue-in-cheek aplomb. Diana Sheehan demonstrates what “heat” might mean as a comely weather-caster surrounded by a bevy of admiring lads. The final number of Act I surprises and delights: Easter Parade, featured later as a major movie production number with Judy Garland. In Lyric Stage’s version, Randy Pearlman, as an elderly gent, croons the tune as a gentle love ballad to Shannon McGrann, his frail inamorata seated in a high-backed wheelchair. Pearlman’s well-modulated voice exudes lyrical tenderness and understated sincerity that makes the song sound fresh and new. In Act II, the only truly serious commentary in the show comes in Scene 5. Feleicia Benton sings the heart-wrenching Suppertime below headline “Unknown Negro Lynched by Frenzied Mob”. She portrays a working class woman preparing dinner for her children while wondering how she’ll explain why their father won’t be coming home. Benton’s smoky tones caress the song with operatic pathos and emotive power. Curious to learn how audiences reacted to this vignette in pre-Civil Rights 1930’s…. This dark scene is followed immediately by the most completely realized and off-the wall send up in the revue: an imaginary British royal family ”coping with excess” under the NY Times headline “Prince of Wales Rumored Engaged.” Doug Jackson as king and Diana Sheehan as queen preside with Monty Python-esque self-congratulatory pomp as a daffy, frumpy royal couple who fail to comprehend their way less than wholesome Prince of Wales son, played with debauched ennui and lecherous eye for the maid (Shannon McGrann) by hyper-kinetic Brian Patrick Hathaway. Delectably shameful display of “naughty, naughty.” Tut, tut.
Gary Okeson accompanies the charming affair with easy mastery on a rich-toned, full-sized grand piano and triumphs as well as production musical director. As Thousands Cheer draws a polite crowd. Thousands may not exactly be cheering, but they certainly clap loud and long as they surge to their feet in approval at the show’s finale. Not a single off-color word uttered on stage all evening.
Final four performances May 7, 8, 9 at 8pm; May 9 at 2:30pm.

For tickets: 972-252-2787, www.lyricstage.org

Doug Jackson and Diana Sheehan in Lyric Stage’s AS THOUSANDS CHEER. Photo by James Jamison

Posted in Theatre Reviews | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Plain Sarah: DTC work in progress

Posted by sjamaanka on 4 May 2009

Sarah, Plain and Tall makes a powerful visual impression. It’s a family friendly musical based on Patricia MacLachlan 1986 Newberry Award-winning novella. Dallas Theater Center Artistic Director Kevin Moriarty chose to mount it as the company’s final production at the Kalita Humphreys venue, before the huge move to the new Dallas Performing Arts Center. The eye-catching set consists of a giant collage of weathered wooden siding that flies in and out, up and down, with dreamlike ease. Some of it defines exterior barn doors and windows; some opens to reveal country interior kitchen and pantry elements. Behind it floats ocean fog, or sky over prairie grasses, rolling on forever. The set immediately conveys a sense of the utilitarian power and dignity found in massive 19th century barns and helps to define the character of a play where the outdoors, a Maine seashore and a Kansas prairie, matters as much as any human character in the script. Elegant, simple and impressive, it’s softly lit to reflect the natural lighting of overwhelming seaside or prairie expanses. Kudos to scenic designer Anna Louizos and lighting designer Chris Lee.

Herndon Lackey, Becca Ayers, Max Ary, Kate Wetherhead

Herndon Lackey, Becca Ayers, Max Ary, Kate Wetherhead

This show has evolved over the years from the book to a memorable 1991 television movie featuring Glenn Close and Christopher Walken to a 2002 children’s musical produced by New York City’s nationally recognized TheatreWorks USA, with book, lyrics and music by the same creative team who developed the current version (Julia Jordan, Nell Benjamin and Laurence O’Keefe). DTC bills the current expanded two-act incarnation as a world premiere. It features a prominent national cast, with one local youth actor, and is directed by the prolific, award-winning New York based Joe Calarco. It feels like a way, way Off Broadway trial run that’s more of a work in progress than a finished production.

Music: For many years musicals featured meager, fluffy plots as thinly disguised excuses to parade a string of show-stopping chorus numbers and virtuoso solos. Singers, with operatic vocal power and training, were usually un-miked. Social issues, when presented, played second fiddle to catchy tunes and sustained vocal lines. The pendulum has now swung. With certain notable exceptions, today’s typical “musical” emphasizes current social and/or political issues. It exhibits sterling special lighting and sound effects that require high-grade professional talents and equipment to execute, mikes its lead singers cleverly so they don’t need to “strain” or practice precise diction. The music folds into the show as downplayed afterthought, an accessory, almost an embarrassment. Why can’t there be balance? Not one memorable song emerges from this show.

Consider the vibrant array of 19th century Americana music and folk tunes, from sea chanties to mournful cowboy laments to rousing tent revival gospel tunes to lyrical love songs with Celtic influence. None of the music in Sarah, Plain and Tall reflects or draws recognizable inspiration from any worthy Americana tradition. Seems that would be a no-brainer for a quintessentially Americana musical. Given the roles they’ve played prior, DTC’s cast members are quite capable of outstanding performance. Not one has a genuine opportunity to showcase a trained, high caliber voice or advance the show’s plot, energy or emotional tension through musical exploration. Herndon Lackey portrays the male lead, widower Jacob seeking a bride. His voice hints at power and intensity, rich masculinity capable of expressing a full range of human emotion. He has portrayed Inspector Javert in Les Miserables. Aha. Watching him in Sarah, Plain and Tall, I wished I were seeing him in the former show. The only attention-getting number comes mid Act I – the comic duet “Let’s Never Do That”, interpreted enthusiastically by secondary leads Matthew and Maggie (Colin Hanlon and Cristen Paige). Interesting as it may be, it feels “tacked on”, exhibiting a different style, tempo and energy from anything else in the score. Curiously, the Song List in my press packet doesn’t list the duet, while the show program does….

Character and Plot: There is plenty of opportunity to reveal the thoughts and emotions of the play’s characters at adult levels. This version keeps everything fast-paced and superficial, as if it is still envisioned as playing to an under age 17 crowd with limited attention span. How does widower Jacob feel about the loss of his wife? There’s a marvelous solo opportunity. He grouches, growls and mopes. We get no sense of a loving relationship or a man longing for reconnection. He forbids his almost adult daughter to sing a lullaby his deceased wife would croon to her two children. Conflict! The lullaby could haunt the show, revealed a cappella in short phrases at first, woven in with increasing accompaniment later as Jacob grows beyond his loss and his daughter establishes her independence. Resolution? Lead character Sarah’s Act I expository solo “The Captain’s Daughter” hints at the reasons why Sarah is “peculiar”, a “loner”, but falls short of lasting dramatic impact. How interesting it could be if the song re-emerged in Act II, with additional verses allowing Sarah to show emotional depth. Instead, Sarah goes through a quick “Eliza Doolittle” type of superficial transformation, and Jacob and his reluctant daughter are completely won over by her change of clothing and a swimming lesson at the farm pond. It’s not convincing or inspiring. I can’t imagine too many regional theatre companies leaping at the chance to produce this show, as it exists, in an economy where people spend discretionary funds carefully. My guess is Sarah Plain and Tall will go through extensive revamping when it moves on. I’m sorry the Dallas production did not live up to its stunning set’s promise.

The Dallas Theater Center presents Sarah Plain and Tall through May 24 at the Kalita Humphreys Theater 3636 Turtle Creek Boulevard. Tickets: www.dallastheatercenter.org 214-522-8499

Posted in Theatre Reviews | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »